Showing posts with label voting. Show all posts
Showing posts with label voting. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 11, 2012

DEMOCRATS BEHAVING BADLY: Wendy Rosen



If you ever wonder why Democrats don't want any scrutiny of people voting in elections here is exhibit A:

"Wendy Rosen, the Democratic challenger to Republican Rep. Andy Harris in the 1st Congressional District, withdrew from the race Monday amid allegations that she voted in elections in both Maryland and Florida in 2006 and 2008."

Wednesday, September 05, 2012

THEY CALL IT DEMOCRACY?

FROM THOSE WONDERFUL FOLKS WHO RAMMED THROUGH OBAMACARE   

The Democrats call this democracy?

Wednesday, February 06, 2008

My Super Tuesday and my right to write in

I traveled back from Washington D.C. to come vote in the Democratic primary here in New York. I was not looking forward to it. Because I knew I could not bring myself to vote for either Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama. I was trying to decide on which of the other candidates who were still listed on the ballot I would vote for. It was a toss up between John Edwards or Joe Biden, I was leaning toward Joe Biden because I like his foreign policy talk and besides I had shaken hands with him soon after he announced. But, when I got to the polling place I decided to see to see if I could do a write in. This caused all kinds of confusion amoung the election workers. Finally someone said I could. OK, I said what do I need to do? You need to do it in the machine was the response. All right how do I do that? Again blank stairs and no reponse. I asked again what do I need to do?
Finally a poll worker came up to me and told me not tell anyone that I told you this but, you lift up one of the panels on the top row and write the name in there. So that's what I did. I lifted the metal panel and there on the blank space I wrote in Lou Dobbs. I left feeling much better about voting than when I arrived.

Tuesday, October 30, 2007

Bringing Democrats out of the shadows.

In a New York Times article by LESLIE WAYNE which deals with the hidden agenda of the Democrats to register Hispanic voters. But, true to the liberal bias of the New York Times the article does not even mention the 800 pound gorilla in the country i.e. illegal immigrants at all in the entire article. While I am a registered Democrat I have this crazy notion that our elected officials should represent the wishes of the people. Though the actions of Dems like Eliot Spitzer to give drivers licenses to illegal immigrants seem to show the Dems have other ideas. It's not about representing the people it's about staying in power. Those two ideas are not the same. Here are the money quotes:

"At La Favorita, a Mexican grocery store here, there is plenty of food for sale — and also a new brand of politics.A handwritten sign, hanging over the door, proclaims in Spanish: “Wake up! Register to vote! It is the hour to unite and change our future, the future of our children — and the future of this country!”

I just wonder which country and whose future the Democrats are talking about here. It certainly seems it's not the middle class voters. Of course the Democrats are trying to hide their real political agenda from the citizens:

“Democratic strategists know that the Latino vote is their future,” said Hector Avalos, a professor and founder of the U.S. Latino Studies program at Iowa State University. “But they are having to handle this with kid gloves. They don’t want to anger native Iowans. But they know that there could potentially be millions of new voters nationwide. Democrats are sort of treading lightly, and trying to appease both sides.”

When the the Democrats like the illegal immigrants try to hide their real agenda and continue to ignore the wishes of the people. They do so at their own peril. I also think the temptation to commit voter fraud by the Democrats using the illegal immigrant population in their thirst for political power is a very real possibility. This is not just a threat to the Republicans but, a threat to our Democracy and everyone should be concerned about that no matter what party you are with.

Monday, August 27, 2007

Politics should not be made easy for any party.

LOS ANGELES -- California Republicans are floating a ballot initiative that would change how the state awards its 55 electoral votes, a whopping prize that Democrats have come over the past four presidential elections to regard as theirs.-Washington Post
This idea floated by the Republicans in Californis is one of the more interesting ideas in making our Democracy work better. Here are some of the money quotes:

"It has a gut-level appeal to it," said Kevin Eckery, a GOP consultant supporting the initiative, which would be put before voters in June. "It sounds fair, and it is fair."

I agree. After seeing the debacle of the 2000 election. Anything that moves us toward a popular vote where EVERY district and vote matters will make the politicians from both parties more responsive to the wishes of all the people not just those enclaves where the strategists think they can win the whole electoral pot.

"You're looking at between 19 and 22 votes that would shift to the Republican side," said Chris Lehane, a Democratic strategist mobilizing against the proposal. "The electoral math becomes very challenging."

It should be challenging Mr. Lehene. To me it is not about making elections easier for any party it is about making the parties earn every vote. That is a good thing.

"That plan was a brainchild of Colorado Democrats, who had seen all of their state's votes awarded to the Republican candidate in five of the previous six elections despite reliable Democratic showings in some districts."

While the movement toward a Congressional district divide of electoral votes in California is being led by the Republicans. It is interesting that the idea was first started by the Democrats of Colorado. For me after seeing how many Democrats spearheaded and voted for the recent Senate illegal immigrant amnesty bill it would be another check against those that will pander for votes (like many of the Democrats did) if they know that their votes will have more repercussions when it comes to the national elections. Like I said it is not about making the job easy for the politicians it's about making them represent the wishes of the people.